Data Asset Register¶
Ready
Purpose. The catalogue of what data you hold, who owns it, how sensitive it is, and where it lives. Almost every other governance control depends on it.
When to use it. Start it early and keep it current. Review entries at least annually, and whenever a system or a data flow changes.
How to use it. Register your ten most important assets properly rather than every asset badly. A short accurate register is used; an exhaustive stale one is not. Set a review date on every row so staleness becomes visible.
Closes assessment gaps
This template addresses Q05, Q08, Q26, Q28 in the readiness assessment.
Fill it in here¶
Work directly in the browser — nothing is uploaded, and your rows are saved on this device. Download to Excel whenever you want, or save a file you can reopen later.
Loading the editable register…
The template¶
Register fields¶
| Field | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Asset ID | Stable reference for linking from other registers |
| Name & description | What it actually is, in business language |
| Domain | Links to the owner |
| Data Owner | Named accountable person |
| Steward | Day-to-day contact |
| Classification | Drives handling rules |
| Personal data? | Triggers DPIA and lawful basis questions |
| Special category? | Triggers additional protection |
| System of record | Where the authoritative copy lives |
| Source | Where it came from; licence if external |
| Lawful basis | Required for personal data |
| Used in AI? | Links to AI System Inventory |
| Quality thresholds | Links to Data Quality Standard |
| Retention | How long, and under what rule |
| Last reviewed / next review | Makes staleness visible |
The register¶
| ID | Asset | Domain | Owner | Class. | Personal? | System | Used in AI | Retention | Next review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DA-001 | Customer master | Customer | [name] | Confidential | Yes | [CRM] | AI-003 | [7y] | [date] |
| DA-002 | Employee records | Employee | [name] | Confidential | Yes | [HRIS] | AI-007 | [6y post-exit] | [date] |
| DA-003 | Product telemetry | Product | [name] | Internal | No | [warehouse] | AI-001 | [2y] | [date] |
| DA-004 | Support transcripts | Customer | [name] | Confidential | Yes | [helpdesk] | AI-002 | [3y] | [date] |
Practical guidance¶
Start where the risk is. Personal data, regulated data, and anything feeding an AI system first. Marketing collateral can wait.
One row per asset, not per table. "Customer master" is an asset; forty database tables that compose it are not forty assets.
The "used in AI" column earns its keep. When a model misbehaves, this is how you find what fed it. When a data subject exercises their rights, it is how you find where they appear.
The staleness test
A register nobody has updated in six months is a liability, not a control — it gives false assurance. Better to register fewer assets and keep them true.
Maintenance¶
| Trigger | Action |
|---|---|
| New system or data flow | Register before production use |
| Classification change | Update; review downstream handling |
| New AI use of the asset | Update the AI column; check lawful basis covers it |
| Annual review | Owner confirms accuracy or corrects |
Adaptation notes¶
- Small organisations: A spreadsheet with the first eight columns is genuinely enough. Do not buy a catalogue tool before you have proven you will maintain a list.
- Existing catalogue tooling: Do not duplicate. Add the governance-specific fields — owner, classification, lawful basis, AI usage — to what you already have.
- Regulated sectors: Add lineage and critical-data-element flags, and link to your regulatory reporting inventory.
Related¶
- Data Governance Framework — Ready
- Data Classification & Handling Policy — Ready
- AI System Inventory — Ready
- Processing & DPIA Log — Ready
Not legal advice
These templates are a head start, not a substitute for professional judgement. Adapt them to your jurisdiction, sector, and risk appetite, and have qualified counsel review anything material before you rely on it.